Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMPM/1135/2008 of ASHOK KUMAR Vs STATE on 30 December 2008
of 2008. 30.12.2008 Present: Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General for the respondent-State. Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate for Trishla Sharma. The learned Additional Advocate General submits that the custody of the petitioner is no more
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
Cr.M.P.(M) No.1135 of 2008.
30.12.2008 Present:
Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General for the respondent-State.
Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate for Trishla Sharma.
The learned Additional Advocate General submits that the custody of the petitioner is no more required by the police in the present case. Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma undertakes that the petitioner will take good care of his wife and allow her to live with him at Ludhiana. Consequently, the petition is allowed on the same terms and conditions as contained in order dated 3[rd] November, 2008 with the condition that the petitioner will treat his wife, Smt. Trishla Sharma properly. In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case though the application for bail is disposed of, however, liberty is reserved to Smt. Trishla Sharma to bring to the notice of the Court any act of the petitioner contrary to the undertaking given by him in this case.
December 30, 2008. (sck)
(Rajiv Sharma), J.