Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMPM/631/2016 of STATE OF HP Vs SUNIL KUMAR on 30 December 2016
of 2016 30.12.2016. Present: Mr. Virender Verma, Addl. AG, for the appellant. Mr. Ankit Aggarwal, Proxy Counsel for respondent No. 2. Appeal against accused-respondent No. 1 stands abated. Having gone through the contents of the application and reply thereto filed on behalf of accused-respondent
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Cr.MP(M) No. 631 of 2016
30.12.2016. Present: Mr. Virender Verma, Addl. AG, for the appellant.
Mr. Ankit Aggarwal, Proxy Counsel for respondent No. 2.
Appeal against accused-respondent No. 1 stands abated.
Having gone through the contents of the application and reply thereto filed on behalf of accused-respondent No. 2, we are satisfied that the delay as occurred in filing the appeal is neither intentional nor deliberate and rather stands satisfactorily explained. The application as such is allowed. The appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
Cr.MP(M) No. 630 of 2016
Leave to appeal granted. The application is allowed and stands disposed of.
Appeal be registered.
Cr.AST No. 20220 of 2016
Admit.
The respondent-accused Kuldeep Bhushan to furnish personal bond in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge within four weeks from today. There shall be a direction to learned trial Court to remit the bail bonds to the Registry of this Court for being taken on record of this appeal.
(Dharam Chand Chaudhary), Judge.
December 30, 2016(vs)
(Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge.