Gujarat High Court
CR.RA/99/2001 of DINESHBHAI PARSHOTTAMBHAI VAGHELA Vs PURABIA DHANJIBHAI BHANUBHAI on 19 December 2001
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No 99 of 2001 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No 99 of 2001
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- DINESHBHAI PARSHOTTAMBHAI VAGHELA
Versus
PURABIA DHANJIBHAI BHANUBHAI
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Criminal Revision Application No. 99 of 2001
MR YATIN SONI for Petitioners No. 1-2
MR FB BRAHMBHATT for Respondent No. 1
MR HL JANI, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent No. 2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT
Date of decision: 19/12/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
#. Heard the learned advocates.
#. This Revision Application under Section 397 read with Section 401 CrPC has been preferred against the order dated 5th March, 2001 made by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Lakhtar, ordering issuance of search warrant in Criminal Misc.Application No.4/2001.
#. Learned advocate Mr.Soni appearing for the petitioners concedes that the petitioners' daughter Sangita is at present residing with the petitioners. He agrees that the petitioners shall remain present before the learned Magistrate alongwith their daughter Sangita on 28th December, 2001 at 11 O'clock.
#. In view of the above statement made by Mr.Soni, the impugned order dated 5th March, 2001 directing issuance of search warrant is quashed and set aside on condition that the petitioners shall remain present before the learned Magistrate alongwith their daughter Sangita on 28th December, 2001 at 11 O'clock and on further condition that the petitioners shall bring the said Sangita before the learned Magistrate on any subsequent date if so directed by the learned Magistrate. The Revision Application is allowed in the above terms. Rule is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.
19th December, 2001.��( Ms. R.M.Doshit, J. )
/sakkaf