Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/2251/2001 of KUMARI SULOCHANA Vs CHIEF MUNICIPAL OFFICER and ORS. on 27 November 2001
COURT oi- JIEDICATURE AT BILAsmR (c.G.) ‘Z/ WRIT PETITION Naar}Q- ‘Wb5) 03' 2001 BETWEEN "Kumari Sulochana, aged 25 years, D/o N.D.Patel, reSident 0f Village Pithora, Tahsil Mahasamund, District mhasamund. %TI TIONER AND 1 mief A Municipal O££icer, Nagar Panchayat,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
‘Z/IN THE HIGHCOURT oi- JIEDICATURE AT BILAsmR(c.G.)WRITPETITION Naar}Q-[‘Wb]5)03'2001B ETWEEN"KumariSulochana,aged25years,D/o[N.D.Patel,]reSident0f VillagePithora,TahsilMahasamund,District mhasamund.
%TI TIONER
AND-miefiAMunicipalO££icer,NagarPanchayat,Pithara,matrict and TahsilMahasamund.DineshSinghPatel,aged26years,S/oY.F.Pate1,R/oVillagePithora,TahsilanaDistrict Mahasamuné.¥‘-‘v@'.;"NagarPanchayat,Pithora,(kt;a..-"",x93-[WA]IJTahsilandDistrictt Mahaaamnna§1Jy(*"RESPONDENTSéJy'WITR EWITIONUNDER ARTIaEs226/227OF THEcomsTITUTIONOFINDIAE'ORISSUANCE OFWRITIN THE NATURE[OF]CERTIORARIOR ANYI‘OTHER APPROPRIATE FORMW‘IICH THISHON'BLECWR‘I‘ DEEMS FIT
1
The petitioner namedabove humbiry[submits]asunder:—
WWW31mm‘m 81W\consequent1‘0fhed"rec1'ionofTheColiecmr,primar,facial Wm;ieierence[of fhe][ orde]of ferminafion is called for.~In fhe resultis peiifionis disposed of.The impugnedardér-ofTermina'rimLissued‘rhe9n,[08.10.2001]byNagar)?Panchnyaf, Pi‘rhom is1' aside.The petitioner- shall [be allowedfocon'finue‘asShik['l'm‘][ 'Kermi‘Gr-dde]IinfhesubjectofLr Chemistrya‘r fheafovJsa‘‘id'school.