Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/2474/2001 of SMT.SHANTI DEVI AGRAWAL Vs THE STATE OF C.G. and ORS. on 7 December 2001
AGRAWAL Wife of Shri a1, aged about ‘46 years, esident of ar Ra SMT. Omprakash Agraw Ramsiag Para, ipur PETITIONER ’4’— STATE OF CHI-IATTISGARH hrough the Clector, . t ol 2. RAIUR MUNICIPAL ed under CORPORATION he relevant Provisions A Body o M.P. at Malviya Municipal
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
'IN THE[HIGH][ COURT][ OF][ HmICATURE][ AT][ BILASPUR]
2‘'1W.P.[No.17gof][ 200]WifeofShriAGRAWALSMT.SHANTIDEVI‘46ResidentofAgrawa1,agedaboutyears,OmprakashRamsiagarPara,Raipur’4’—PETITIONERVERSUSolt.STATE[OF][ CHI-IATTISGARH][ hrough][ the][ Clector,]RauripABodyCORPORATION2.CorporateRAIURP[Cstitut][MUNICIPAL]oned[under]the relevant[Provisions]ofM.P.MunicipalCorporation Act,1ha956'ving[its][ Office]Road,Raipur [through][ the][ Commissioner][ of]at Malviya1p1.mQ%§€\’3\.COMISNER,MSIORaipurMuniceipalQg"l“m{wm‘Cooration,MVialya[Road,Raipur.]33’RESPONDENTSQw”? 5p/§\'if%7226[&]227[OF][ THE][ CONSTITUTION][ OF]'V«swPETITION[UNDER][ ARTICLE]‘I IA FOR THE[ISSUANCE][ OF][ WRITS][ IN]AND/OR[ THE][ NATURE][FOR][ THE][ OF][ DIRECTIONS][ PROHIBITION][ IN]AND/OR[FOR][ ORDER][ S]AMUS[ETC]THE[NATURE][ OF][ THE][ WRITs]
200i
civicameni‘riesanddamageofroads.I‘ralsocausesfrqfficobs‘rrucfion and hindrancein smoofhfra‘Ffic.This Cour‘r hgd passedorders from Time f0 Time on 17.08.2p01 and[on][ 28.09.2001.]\4)The Apex Cour?in AhimedabadMunicipal Corporationv.Nawab Khan Gulab Khan and[ofher-](AIR[1997][ 5C]has deal'r wi‘rh*52)1he mafrer' In grea'i' de‘l'ailThe Jud emenf has been read[ In][exfenso]5)Counsel for fhe respoem‘s pom'red ou’r['rhaf]some[of][ $he]'Tiiioners'l’hefiled bymerely on apprehension.pe‘rifions[have][ been]Therespondenfs/Corpora'rion aaufhorifieshaveinspecfedspofand also made enquiries regarding1‘ e consfrucfion.
6) Counselfor1'hereponden‘l's/Corpora‘honfur‘rhersubmrrred Tha‘r Therushed1'0['rhe]High Courf['l'houglP] pe‘h‘honers havdispufedquesfionsoffadsareinvolvedandeachcaserestsonde'l'ermination of +hose fac‘rs.Inrfain cases where nofices are noTserved 1hey are prema'rure[as][ well][ as][ in][ ofher cases][ ‘rhe][ Corpora'rion]andfheau'rhori‘riesrequiringdeoli‘l'ionwillservendfice1'0Theandin, Thosecasesherenoticeshavealreadybeenpefi‘rionersserved.Thepe-‘ri'l'ioners[may][ now]file replysuppor'l'ed- by'affidavi‘l‘s’onanddocumen‘l's e1'c., whichwill beonsidered and decidedifs ownmeri'l'in accordancewi'l'hlaw.Ife pefi‘l'ioners giveinwri'l'ingwii'haffidavif on‘rhafare desirous of being heard,points[specified]lihey‘l'hey shallalsobeheardbyThel Corporafionorby'l'heaufhori‘ryconcerned asf’ ar a‘s'po‘ssi‘blei“, '.shof XI—HC-22