Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/11600/2011 of RAJINDER SINGH DOD Vs STATE on 29 December 2011
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 11600 of 2011-J Decided on: 29th December, 2011. Rajinder Singh Dod S/o Sh. Mehtab Singh Dod R/o village Saraswati Nagar, P.O. Haatkoti, Tehsil Jubbal, Distt. Shimla, presently posted as DPE in Govt. Sen. Secondary School, Pandranoo, Tehsil Jubbal,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,SHIMLA.
CWP No. 11600 of 2011-J
Decided on: 29[th] December, 2011.
Rajinder Singh Dod S/o Sh. Mehtab Singh Dod R/o village Saraswati Nagar, P.O. Haatkoti, Tehsil Jubbal, Distt. Shimla, presently posted as DPE in Govt. Sen. Secondary School, Pandranoo, Tehsil Jubbal, Distt. Shimla, H.P.
…Petitioner.
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State of H.P. through the Secretary (Education) to the Govt. of HP, Shimla-2.
2. The Director, Elementary Education, H.P. Shimla.
…Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge.
For the petitioner : Mr. M.S. Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondents :
Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral)
This issue pertaining to the vacation salary to contract teachers is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No.415 of 2000, titled as Baldev Singh and others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others and the judgment has become final. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to release the due and admissible vacation salary, during the entire service period, to the petitioner in case the same has not been granted so far, within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment, referred to above. If the amounts are not disbursed as above, the petitioner will be entitled to interest @ 10% and the officers responsible for the delay shall be personally liable for the same.
2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.
(Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice
29[th] December, 2011.
(kck)
(Justice Dev Darshan Sud), Judge.