Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/1687/2002 of RAJKUMAR KASHYAP Vs THE STATE OF C.G.and ORS. on 16 December 2002
COURT OF JUDICATER AT BImSPUgLQgATTISGAR§1 ”6&1, OF 2002: WJ’. NO. TECLE 226 OF THE COKEQLTUTION OE INDjf; Rajkumar Ka$hyay ,occupatinn Daiiy wages; Em g ”513% !$\\M§QL. K WRIT PETTIOI‘I UKDERAR 3011 9f Sbri Goyal mwacl/ag t/gn“ PETTIONER ;; M ployee
IN THE[EIGH][ COURT][ OF][ JUDICATER][ AT][ BImSPUgLQgATTISGAR§1]
2002:
”6&1,[OF]
WJ’.NO.TECLE[226][ OF][ THE][ COKEQLTUTION][ OE][ INDjf;]WRIT[PETTIOI‘I][ UKDER AR]Goyal3011[[9f][ Sbri]][[ Sbri]]Ka$hyayRajkumarPETTIONERM;; mwacl/ag[t/gn“]
Goyalmwacl/ag3011[[9f][ Sbri]][[ Sbri]]Ka$hyayRajkumarDaiiywages;EmployeeinGeolag'cal,occupatinng[”513%][ !$\\M§QL.]w‘o$M[wrmm]Kt,Sub[Oftice],[Bilaaéur](0G3/and Mmmgv’wthrough"$tateofChhattigarh. Gavt. 0f0.6.,[})§]§vtmant[of]Tha[Seamtary]Resouxws,D.K.S.BhuwanMineralRaiy1u:(C.G.)MineaGovt.OiofGeolog‘cai[And]DireactorateGhhattisgath[Raiput][ (Chhatiigarh)]The[O§ce][ In][ Charge][ Direcmrate][ of][ Geolow][ and]MiningCWtti$g3IhS1110O$caBilasyur
1. RESPQNmNT[y»]
(Chkwtiisgarm
W
MM.M
WW
M’wm/az
29$
gm??? WEE?
;ma
Page 1 of 2
aqxQSI‘E’fmW:m%<wfT@WEma;mam‘w mmww‘aqMsnE—wW; $1“?!16- 1 2-20Q2‘tIShri Alok Bakshi, coun$bl for ma petitionar.Shri Sanjay K Agarwal, Dy. Adv. General for the State:It is stated by the 16ame§ti counsel for the p€titioner that afterEing of this writ petition, which was‘ for mgulalj‘za'é’o’ii, the sen/icesof the péfitioner has baen t€rmj11at€d. Accordingly, he would like toWithdraw this writ petition witli liberty to file a properly constitumdwrit petition challongmg the oriei‘ of termination also.Asprayed,heispermittedto Withdrawthepetition[with]libero; to me a fresh writ petition.Accordingly,thepetitior.stands disposed of as withdrawn.ConsequentlyLA.No.5520I'2002forurgenthealing8aLA.No.6250/ 2002 for amendmentare also stand disposed of.FSd/-P_c.NaikJudge,rHrt {ewe}
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…