Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/5616/2012 of Ku.anjali Khapardey Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. on 27 December 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (Sl No. ^/J (-, OF 2012. PETITIONER ^^^^-^ "^!"--"^ f—', Ku. Anjali Khapardey. D/o. Shri Binu Ram ^^ Khapardey.aged about 21 years, ^ R/o. Village- Salhebhat, Thasil^ Thana, Post- Kanker^District - ^'North Baster, Kanker
^^
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR
W. P. (Sl No. ^/J(-,OF 2012.
Ku. Anjali Khapardey.D/o. Shri Binu Ram^^Khapardey.aged about^ 21 years,R/o. Village- Salhebhat, Thasil^Thana, Post- Kanker^District[-]^'North Baster, Kanker (C.G.)
PETITIONER
^^-^^^"^!"--"^f—',
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
/1-.State of Chhattisgarh,
Through : The Secretary,Department of Scheduled Castesand Scheduled TribesDepartment of Scheduled Castesand Scheduled Tribes Development Department,D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.)D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.)
2. The District Collector, Kanker,District- North Baster.KankerDistrict- North Baster.Kanker /"
/
3yThe District Caste ScrutinyCommittee, Collector atepremises,[Kanker,][ District-][ North]Baster, Kanker. (C.G.)Committee, Collector atepremises,[Kanker,][ District-][ North]Baster, Kanker. (C.G.)
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA
The petitioners named above beg to submit as under:- l^PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER:
K
HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISJ
V.P.(S)No..5Sieor2012
TITIONE
y;,t Bi;^i; fi
Page 1 of 2
Versus
State of Ch'nattisgarh and ot'ners.
ihrt SomKanl Verma, counsei forlhe petitloner.Shn Ajsy Dwiv^di, Dy. Oo\ft. Advoc^t®fof the -State.
Learned counsei for the petitiotner would submit that the petitioner hasbeen appointed as Assistant GradeHSin the office of Col'ector rrribalDeveSopment) District North Bastar, KanS<t;:i- or; 03/11/2012 piirsuant to whichshe has ioined on ihe Dost and has thereafier approached the respondenf No. 3Tor providing required forrn for subrnission of apptteation for venfication of hercaste status m tenns ofthejudgment rendered by Hon'bie the Siipreme Court infhernatterofPati!anotherVs.0124'?. He wou!d submit thaf in the event her caste status is not verifled wthin twornonfhs her semces may be terminated and she shali suffer irreparabSe !oss.
i'2'iConsiderina the entire fact siiuation of the case it is directed that if thepeSitioner approaches the respondent No. 3 wit'nin one week from today therequired appiication fonn shal! be supplied and the petitioner sha!! submit a dulyfiUeci m appiication Tonn withm a week thereafter for verification of her castestatiis and thereafter the cone&med authoilty sha!i sctUSinize/verify her castes5a?us within a pericd of W" months Shere'F'fter,R Is rnade i;tear that theverification shailbe done siricfly in accordance with !aw iaid down by She Hon'bleSiipreme Coiirt in the matter of KumariPati! (supra),
(3) The Caste Scrutiniv Commrttee shaij decide thewithin an outer['im'rt]of fwo months and duririg this period She pet'rtioner's services shaii not bediscontinued on the grounri that she has faiieid to su'omif duiv verified caste Sd//- Certffied copv today.
prashant Kumar MishraV.Judge
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…