Himachal Pradesh High Court

C.REV/17/2008 of SAROJ JAITLY Vs SANGEETA SACHDEVA on 31 December 2008

No. 17 of 2008 31.12.2008 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suneel Mohan Goel, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala submits that after the order passed by the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Shimla on

C. Review No. 17 of 2008

31.12.2008 Present:

Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Suneel Mohan Goel, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala submits that after the order passed by the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Shimla on 30.10.2008, the present review petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the same is dismissed having become infructuous.

(Rajiv Sharma), J.

December 31, 2008.

(cr)

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead