Gujarat High Court
SCA/2017/1988 of THAKKAR BABULAL GOPALJI Vs DIRECTOR,AGRICULTURAL MARKETING & RURAL FINANCE on 3 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2017 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2017 of 1988
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- THAKKAR BABULAL GOPALJI
Versus
DIRECTOR,AGRICULTURAL MARKETING & RURAL FINANCE -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR RP BHATT for Petitioners GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 3, 7 MR KS JHAVERI for Respondent No. 6
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
Date of decision: 03/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Ld. Advocate Shri M.R.Bhatt is appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Ld. Advocate Shri V.M.Pancholi, AGP is appearing on behalf of the respondent no.1 & 2. When the said matter has been called out for final hearing, the learned Advocate Shri M.R.Bhatt who is appearing on behalf of the petitioner makes a statement before this Court that by passage of time the said petition has become infructuous and therefore does not require any decision on merits. Therefore, in view of the said statements made by Ld. Advocate Mr.Bhatt, the said petition is disposed of as having become infructuous and therefore rule is discharged with no orders as to costs.
���****
jitu