Gujarat High Court
SCA/3832/1986 of GUJARAT STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION Vs FATEHSINH C DABHI on 12 December 1997
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3832 of 1986 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3832 of 1986
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- GUJARAT STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION
Versus
FATEHSINH C DABHI
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR HARDIK RAVAL for Petitioner
MR HK RATHOD for Respondent
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
Date of decision: 12/12/97
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Mr H K Rathod, learned counsel for the respondent
- workman states that the respondent expired about two years back.
This petition under Article 227 of the
Page 1 of 2
Constitution is filed by the Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation for challenging the judgment and award dated November 16, 1984 passed by the Labour Court, Ahmedabad setting aside the order of dismissal of the respondent workman and directing the petitioner - Corporation to reinstate him in service but without payment of backwages. Mr Rathod states that the respondent workman was reinstated in service in compliance with the award under challenge, as the same was not stayed.
Since the award was already complied with earlier and the respondent - workman has died, this petition no longer survives. The petition has already abated.
Rule is discharged.
December 12, 1997���(M.S. Shah, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…