Gujarat High Court

SCA/3832/1986 of GUJARAT STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION Vs FATEHSINH C DABHI on 12 December 1997

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3832 of 1986 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3832 of 1986

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH

============================================================

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?

-------------------------------------------------------------- GUJARAT STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION

Versus

FATEHSINH C DABHI

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

MR HARDIK RAVAL for Petitioner

MR HK RATHOD for Respondent

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH

Date of decision: 12/12/97

ORAL JUDGEMENT

Mr H K Rathod, learned counsel for the respondent

- workman states that the respondent expired about two years back.

This petition under Article 227 of the

Page 1 of 2

Constitution is filed by the Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation for challenging the judgment and award dated November 16, 1984 passed by the Labour Court, Ahmedabad setting aside the order of dismissal of the respondent workman and directing the petitioner - Corporation to reinstate him in service but without payment of backwages. Mr Rathod states that the respondent workman was reinstated in service in compliance with the award under challenge, as the same was not stayed.

Since the award was already complied with earlier and the respondent - workman has died, this petition no longer survives. The petition has already abated.

Rule is discharged.

December 12, 1997���(M.S. Shah, J.)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead