Gujarat High Court
SCA/12760/1993 of THAKARSIBHAI H.PATEL Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 10 December 2003
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 12760 of 1993 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 12760 of 1993
For Approval and Signature:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?
-------------------------------------------------------------- THAKARSIBHAI H.PATEL
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 12760 of 1993 MR BP TANNA for Petitioner No. 1 MS NANDINI JOSHI, AGP for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
Date of decision: 10/12/2003
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Since the next School Board of Rajkot Municipal Corporation has been constituted under the Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947, this petition has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Ad-interim relief granted earlier stands vacated.