Himachal Pradesh High Court
None 9914 of 2014 on 31 December 2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Decided on: 31.12.2014
Mohan Singh. ….Petitioner versus State of H.P. & others. ….Respondents.
___________________________________________________________
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.S. Rana, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting or not?[1] No For the petitioner: Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Vikram Thakur, Deputy Advocate General.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sanjay Karol, Judge(Oral)
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner’s representation (Annexure P-6) is still pending before respondent No.2/authority concerned.
2. Under instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the said respondent to decide the representation (Annexure P-6) expeditiously. Mr. V.S. Chauhan, learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to the same.
3. Leaving the question of law open, a direction is issued to respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the petitioner’s representation (Annexure P-6) in the light of 1Whether local reporters of the newspapers are allowed to see the judgment?
instructions issued in Annexure P-5, in accordance with law, by affording due opportunity of hearing/representation to the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from today. Needless to add, the authority shall assign reasons while deciding the same which shall be communicated to the petitioner.
4. With the aforesaid observations, petition is disposed of, as also the pending application(s), if any.
(Sanjay Karol)
Judge
31[st] December, 2014 (P.S. Rana)
(kck)