SCA/6904/1995 of NIRAV VASTSYAYAN MUNSHI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 1 December 1997

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?

-------------------------------------------------------------- NIRAV VASTSYAYAN MUNSHI

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

1. Special Civil Application No. 6904 of 1995

MR BR GUPTA for Petitioner

MR MAHESH R RAVAL for Respondent No. 2

MR HB SHAH for Respondent No. 3

2. Misc. Civil Appln.(Contempt Petition)No 175 of 1996

MR BR GUPTA for Petitioner

MR MAHESH R RAVAL for Respondent No. 2

MR HB SHAH for Respondent No. 3

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE S.M.SONI Date of decision: 01/12/97

ORAL JUDGEMENT

Though this matter has been placed on Board on repeated occasions, learned Counsel for the applicant has not chosen to remain present before the Court. Today also when the matter is called out, Mr. Mishra who has filed appearance has not remained present.

In view of the grievance made by the applicant, the Court passed an order of closure against certain Units and affected Units have preferred either Spl. Civil Applications or Civil Applications for trial production etc. Under these circumstances, as the Units are directed to act in accordance with the orders passed in this matter as well as in Spl.CAs and CAs, no fruitful purpose will be served by keeping this Spl.C.A. alive. Hence, this Spl.C.A. is disposed of as the complaint is being considered in other matters.

���(B.C. Patel,J.)

���(S.M.Soni,J.)

sf-bcp.