Gujarat High Court
SCA/2523/1999 of KALASVA KISHOREKUMAR DANIEL Vs A'BAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION on 18 December 2003
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2523 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2523 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- KALASVA KISHOREKUMAR DANIELVersus A'BAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR VD PARGHI for Petitioner No. 1 MR PRADEEP PATEL for the Petitioner. MR RM CHHAYA for Respondent Nos. 1-2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR
Date of decision: 18/12/2003
ORAL JUDGEMENT
On behalf of the petitioner, it is mentioned that since the petitioner has already been selected by an order dated 10.12.2003, he wants to withdraw this petition. Permission is granted. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. No costs.
At the request of the petitioner, the order dated 10.12.2003 is kept on record.
Writ to be sent to the Corporation forthwith in order to apprise the Corporation of the fact that the petition is withdrawn.
18th December, 2003��( P.B. Majmudar, J. )
***
(apj)