Chhattisgarh High Court

WRIT PETITION None on 22 March 1997

EIGH CUURT OF CHHATFE'ISGARH[AT][ B‘LLASPUR]WRIT E’ETITION {C}Na. 7585 of 203?

PETITIONERS:‘f.BhiiaiAutomobilesI’rivateLimitatacompwy dniy incorporaied under[the][ rekvani]provisions[of][ the][ Companies][ Act,][ 1956][ having]itgregisteredoffiwatGE.Road,Pawei‘HousaBhilaiDistrictDurgihroughitsDii'ectgr, Raiegi'; Bhaumi,[ 30:1][ 0%][ Law][ Mukmn’i]La! Bhu‘tani.2.RajeshBhutanisonofLatsMukundIa}Bhutani, aged[about][ 4G]wars[ragwsm][ of][ GE.]Road,E’owerHouseRoad,Bhilai,Director,Bhilai z‘mtomobiles;[Private][ LimitecE,][ Bhilai.]VERSUS

:1..Stateof Chhattisgarh,throughtheSecretaryDepamnentof Town &CoumxyManning,Secretariat. D K[S][ Bhawaxi][ Raipur]2.TheBhilaiMunicipa‘CorporationabociyoonstiiutedundertherelevantprovisionsofCG. Munici‘gal Corporaiion[act,][ 1956][ through]itsCommi ssioner,BhilaiMunicipalCorporation, Bhilai.

RESFONDEN‘IS

PE’i‘ITION UNDER ARTICLE[226][ OF][ 1H]:][ CON][ S'l‘l'IUTION][ OF][ INDXA]§§B:[Htm’ble][ Shri][ Satish][ K.][ Agnihotri,][ J.]

Shri B.P.Shanna, Advocate[with][ Shi'i][ Ajit][ Singh,][ Advocate][ for]{he petitioners.

Present:

Shri Arun Sao[Government][ Advocate][ for][ the][ State]

Sliri H.B.Agr&;wal,[Senior][ Advocate][ with][ Sim.][ Meera][ Jaiswai,]Advocate for iiie respondent[No.][ 2.]

Heard.

ORBER ORAL}ciay of Juiy, 2009){Passed[on][ 16]

Page 1 of 3

By this petition,[the]petitioners[seek a][ writ][ in][ the nature][ ofmandamus]directiiigtherespondentauthoritiestooerfomitheirobiigationundertaken by[them][ wider][ the][ deed][ of][ assignment][ Le.][ to][ execute][ the]lease deed in favour ofthe petitioners[and][ to][ restrain][ the][ respondem]authorities,[their][ agents][ servants][ and][ employees][ from][ imerfering][ with]the possession[of'the]petitioners.Shri Singh, learned[counsei][ appearing][ for][ the]petitioner[submits][ that]initiaiiy the iarid[was][ aliotteti][ to][ Dewanchand][ Bhutani,][ the]grand[father]of thepetitionerNo.2,RajeshBhutani,on22ndMarch,1997('AI’’ioexure[P/i)][ with][ a][ eonciition][ to][ make][ payment][ towards][ premium]and annual lease rent oftiie[land][ in]question.

Amil.t

Shri Agrawal, leamed Semior counselapyaaring for me respondentNo“ 2 submitg that aiier aiiotmem 0f the land, the petitiomrs have notmad¢ any paymant towards yremium or annual lease rem, either to theHindusmn Steei Limited, or the Special Area Deveiopment Authority,(for[short][ ‘SADPQ][ Bhilai][ or][ thereafier][ t0][ the]present[respondent][ No.]3, and as such, the petitioner is not entiiled to any relief as, sought forby thepeotioners.Thepetitionershave mtperfoxmeci[iheir][ own]obligaiion by paying tho premium371d the annual lease ram of thelam.No“ 2 submitg that aiier aiiotmem 0f the land, the petitiomrs have notmad¢ any paymant towards yremium or annual lease rem, either to theHindusmn Steei Limited, or the Special Area Deveiopment Authority,(for[short][ ‘SADPQ][ Bhilai][ or][ thereafier][ t0][ the]present[respondent][ No.]3, and as such, the petitioner is not entiiled to any relief as, sought forby thepeotioners.Thepetitionershave mtperfoxmeci[iheir][ own]obligaiion by paying tho premium371d the annual lease ram of thelam.

Page 2 of 3

0n perusai ofthe records: it is foumi that the $ADA has issued noticesto the petitioners to pay premium, lease annual rem, and the fee forregularisation to the time of Rs. 313E64,534/- by letter dated 01.08.1988(Amexure[P/3).][ No]payment[was][ made][ by][ ihe]petnionerg pursuant[i0]me demand rai$ed by the SADA. Thereafter, the respondent No.3Corporation stepped into the shoes of SADA Though, no demand[was]raised to make payment of the premium,‘ annual leaee rent or otheradmissible dues hut admitteély, premium, annual lease rem[and][ other]dues have not been made[till] date and as suchl no writ may[be][ issued]directing the respondent Corporation to execute[the]lease deed forwant of performance ofthe obligations on the part ofthe petitioners.

Shri Agrawalfutther submits that it‘thepetitionersare ready andWiiling to make payment of the all the requieite dues Viz“ premium,annual lease rent, regularisation charges and other admissible[Charges,]the respondent—Corporation will execute necessary dooumente.

S‘hri Singhg learned counsel apnearing for the netitioners submits thatin View of the above submission, the petitioners are ready and Willingto make all the necessary oayments which are due, and payanle[to][ the]respondent-Coworation for executing the lease deed.

in View of the submission made by learned counsel[appearing][ for][ the]pai‘tiee.[nothing][ survives][ for][ adjudication.]

Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of. No order aeto[costs.]

«/Sd/—Satisil K.[Agihtri]noJudge

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead