Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/297/2001 of VIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH Vs THE STATE OF C.G.and ORS. on 23 November 2001
ffi^®_HI6HCOBB3'®E'CIiHjKISS^Hi ^E BS..ASBBR. ,.'2^ l8.IE se.SSZoi Vlre nira KWsf siBgh son o£ i^fce Kaiifca Prasal siiagfc1 A -*. ca*egery CoHtraptor^BesMeiafc o£ Deviganj ygird- Aib.i.kapia'* Dis'tts- iaFg8ia.(Ghh*). I £S ^ 1 ^ l). Ite gtate of ebfaa't't'isgarb,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
.-^"(yVS^.v^^-^.-^^^i^&^i.'i^-^^^^^^^^1"
iffi^®_HI6HCOBB3'®E'CIiHjKISS^Hl8.IEse.SSZoi
l8.IE
^E BS..ASBBR.
,.'2^
Petittoaer*
Vlrenira KWsf siBgh son o£i^fce Kaiifca Prasal siiagfc1 A-*.ca*egery CoHtraptor^BesMeiafc o£Deviganj ygird- Aib.i.kapia'* Dis'tts-iaFg8ia.(Ghh*).
I £S ^ 1 ^
StaroughIte gtate "the of secretaFy ebfaa't't'isgarb, nater-Ees&Brcss Be.P*•[Ba&][Ka^aB-.]Bbawaa ©.£•Bosa* Batpar (Cto.)
l).
REsPG EIB'S.
/•^/.2>.^'~r!-sv\6 V^'' J V^'' J J •'''4^^t*--^._.^.'^^...••'5).^.^^^'A'^^.^'w(^^,, "»^•.
Tbe cfatef Engiteer,Ba^So KaCfaeiCt.waEfce'" Resaorees-Begt \6 V^'' J V^'' J J •'''•BiIaagw'Xeto.'BiIaagw'Xeto.'' ) *t*--^..
'•BiIaagw'Xeto.'BiIaagw'Xeto.'' ) *.Ihe_. swerinfcendl.ng_..._^._^^- EBgJLBeer,•WSterResowcesBji;vlsM>u,$feyaEl-Bgpnla Fro3ect,®tvtsiO&-Att3ikapBr, Fro3ect,®tvtsiO&-Att3ikapBr,Disfcrle'b-~T -, .^.. SsC'gcga~^^^ (CXh.).".•. •• • ^-• •- '.
Bgpnla Fro3ect,®tvtsiO&-Att3ikapBr, Fro3ect,®tvtsiO&-Att3ikapBr,
4). Tlae Exeeutive EBgiBeer,^Eifeer ResoaTc®sJDlw l.^ioa, swaSPW*Di^ts saFg'a3a (Chh.,l«^«
5).
gbri La3- Babu sl-ngla ~_A-5Category Coatrastor, Ksaarpiz--ipbi£apir»Bi-stts s®'g»3a(Gtila.).
6) ^ M/s. Stei. aaRi sati eraaite^Ge.EbaF Sia'adwaPa,- BaB&I^raS^t'fa>Dls'trt's K©rea(Chh,).
W.1S PEIS'IOM ^Wm ZSaS 2^/22'lffS IHECON^C3S®B3N®EI IA ?£»I^BAKfi @E W1S&SV^ SBEtSE&ISS 'SSW&J.SKEK.^KKSs^SSSSS.MISIC.
Gotrt>d . ... .2
sai
snt?t^T?:ira'3'i5?I^qT^'Hf^T
^ i -All'4i?)4,(5iilwi6, Rwi'ay
"g^
fq^y'
sii^i Wiwafei^MWfli. ifftRff -q fiist '.pilWKq7 STHTq •3T[t?TIt has been fttrfher pointed^ouf that sofarasthe conditionsof the tender are concerned,they have been. nwde by theauthorities of the State and are\the job requwemenls. It vs dlsosubmitted that respondents '5 and\6 havefulfiUedthose conditions.Itis also contendedthatthepetiti^ner is estoppedfromchallengingthe conditions after the tender. parttcipating^nThus having considered thft rival contentions of both theparties and after perusing the ^utterial avmlable on record (is^r<i»(ffvs^?'noticed in the preceding paragrSfphs as the condUions arffSu.chwhich have been fidfilledby the]fesppndents 5 and 6 saidfwtherthat appliccutt pa.rticipated and\submitted^ ^~^~' the ' "^^" tender and'thist".r' " -:petition[has][ beenfdedafter][ due][ s]^rvtiny already made, no caseforinterference under Ardetes 226/^27 of dieConstttwtion of Indiahasbeen madeoutConsequ.ently, thepetvtionf^als andis accordingty disndssed.'C^erttfiedphotocopy.Sd/-Sd/-ChiefJusticeFakhruddin Sd/-FakhruddinJudge