Himachal Pradesh High Court
WRIT PETITION 9891 of 2014 on 31 December 2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.9891 of 2014
Date of decision: 31.12.2014
Sanjay Thakur …..Petitioner
Versus
Chief Electoral Officer & others….. Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr. Ajeet Saklani, Advocate.For the respondents: Ms. Nishi Goel, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. Anup Rattan, Mr. Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.2 to 4.
________________________________________________________________________________
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (oral)
It is averred that the respondents have made the transfer of the petitioner on mutual basis, vide order dated 16[th]October, 2014 (Annexure P-3), which came to be cancelled vide order dated 6[th] December, 2014 (Annexure P-5) on the basis of D.O. Note. It is prayed that the order dated 6[th] December, 2014 (Annexure P-5) may be quashed and respondents be directed to relieve the petitioner. 2. Issue notice to respondents No.1 to 4 only. Ms. Nishi Goel, Advocate and Mr. Romesh Verma, learned Additional Advocate General, waive notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and respondents No. 2 to 4, respectively. 3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to dispose of this writ petition alongwith all pending applications at this stage by directing the respondents to examine the case of the petitioner and make a decision within two weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.
4. It goes without saying that in case the decision goes against the petitioner, he is at liberty to seek appropriate remedy.
( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) Chief Justice
December 31, 2014 ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) (rkv)Judge