Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMPM/2726/2022 of RAMANAND SHARMA Vs STATE OF HP on 30 December 2022
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MP(M) No.2726 of 2022 Decided on: 30th December, 2022 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ramanand Sharma …..Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh .....Respondent
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No.2726 of 2022
Decided on: 30[th] December, 2022
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ramanand Sharma …..Petitioner
…..Petitioner
Versus
.....Respondent
State of Himachal Pradesh
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Whether approved for reporting?[1]
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ajay Kochhar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Avni Kochhar, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Ms. Ritta Goswami, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ram Lal Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. General with Mr. Ram Lal Thakur, Assistant Advocate General.
ASI Aatma Ram, Police Station Rajgarh, District Sirmour, present in person alongwith record.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.29/2021, dated 29.03.2021, registered at Police Station Rajgarh, District Sirmour, H.P., under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The petitioner was arrested in this case on 29.03.2021.
2. The allegations against the petitioner in the afore-numbered FIR are regarding possession of commercial quantity of Cannabis. Status report filed by the respondent 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order?
mentions that out of 21 prosecution witnesses, statements of 10 witnesses have been recorded. The matter is stated to be listed before the learned Trial Court on 19.01.2023 for recording the statements of five prosecution witnesses.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the bail petition at this stage and seeks liberty to file a fresh petition at an appropriate stage in accordance with law, if need so arises in future. The present bail petition is accordingly dismissed with leave and liberty as aforesaid. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
December 30, 2022 Mukesh
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge