Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/3581/2019 of SHOUNI DEVI Vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 31 December 2019

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3581 of 2019-I Date of Decision: December 31, 2019 Shouni Devi ….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others. ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CWP No. 3581 of 2019-I

Date of Decision: December 31, 2019

Shouni Devi….Petitioner

Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh & others. ...Respondents

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge.The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge.Whether approved for reporting?[1] No.

For the petitioner : Mr. Naresh Verma, Advocate, for thepetitioner.petitioner.

For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Addl. AGs and M/s. J.S.Guleria, Yudhbir Singh Thakur & RajuRam Rahi, Dy.AGs, for respondents-State.

Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge(Oral)

Learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on recordthe written instructions in terms of the orders passed on theprevious date which reveal that the transfer of one Smt. LeelaDevi, JBT from Government Primary School, Dharwas toGovernment Primary School, Changli could not beimplemented by the Resident Commissioner, Pangi, DistrictChamba, as yet. Being so, the petitioner who is seeking hertransfer to Government Primary School, Dharwas cannot betransferred there for want of vacancy.

1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. The present in the given facts and circumstances is acase where the intervention of this Court is not required and itis rather the respondents to take a decision for transfer of thepetitioner from Government Primary School, Sural Bhatori toGovernment Primary School, Dharwas if it is feasible to do so.

3. We, therefore, dispose of the writ petition with adirection to the petitioner to make a comprehensiverepresentation to respondent No. 3, the Deputy Director ofElementary Education, Chamba, District Chamba, highlightingher grievances therein within two weeks from today. Therepresentation so made will be considered by respondent No.3 within two weeks thereafter and decision taken qua thetransfer of the petitioner from the present place of posting.Liberty of being heard if required be also given to thepetitioner. Against the surviving grievances, if any, she shallbe at liberty to resort to the remedy available to her inaccordance with law.

4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of so also thepending application(s), if any.

(Dharam Chand Chaudhary), Judge.

December 31 , 2019 (PK)

(Anoop Chitkara), Judge. Judge.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead