Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/9540/2011 of RAM CHARAN Vs STATE on 29 December 2011
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 9540 of 2011-D Date of Decision 29th December, 2011 ________________________________________________________ Ram Charan son of Shri Bhagwan Chand resident of Village Tatan, Post Office Kayas, District Chamba, H.P. ….Petitioner. Versus. 1.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No. 9540 of 2011-D
Date of Decision 29[th] December, 2011
________________________________________________________
Ram Charan son of Shri Bhagwan Chand resident of Village Tatan, Post Office Kayas, District Chamba, H.P.
Versus.
….Petitioner.
1. State of Himachal Pradesh through Secretary (Home) H.P. Secretariat, Shimla-2. Secretariat, Shimla-2.
2. Company Commander (Home Guards) Chamba, H. P.
….Respondents.
Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
_______________________________________________________________
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge.
________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (oral)
The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:
“That the respondent may kindly be directed to assign/allot some duties to the petitioner, in the interest of justice and fair play.”
2. According to the petitioner, despite the request made before the second respondent, no action has been taken so far. There will be a direction to the first respondent to see that the second respondent assigns the duties to the petitioner so long as he is kept in service. Needful be done within two weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner.
3. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
Authenticated Copy.
(Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice.
December 29, 2011
(R/Jai)
(Justice Dev Darshan Sud), Judge