Himachal Pradesh High Court

None 8997 of 2014 on 31 December 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.CWP No. 8997 of 2014

Decided on: 31.12.2014

Sunil Kumar.

….Petitioner

versus

….Respondents.

State of H.P. & others.

___________________________________________________________

Coram

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.S. Rana, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting or not?[1] No For the petitioner: Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Vikram Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sanjay Karol, Judge(Oral)

Mr. Vikram Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 30.12.2014, copy of which already stands supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Evidently, petitioner would be adjusted at the station of his choice. In this view of the matter, present petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.

(Sanjay Karol)

Judge

31[st] December, 2014 (P.S. Rana) (kck)

1Whether local reporters of the newspapers are allowed to see the judgment?

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead