Himachal Pradesh High Court

CRMPM/1581/2017 of RATTI RAM Vs HIMACHAL PRADESH GRAMIN BANK on 29 December 2017

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. _______/ 2017 29.12.2017 Present: Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Divyani Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. Cr.MP No. 1581 of 2017 Heard. For the reasons spelt out in the application, the delay in filing the petition is condoned. The application stands disposed of

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

29.12.2017

Cr. Revision No. _______/ 2017

Present: Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Divyani Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.

Cr.MP No. 1581 of 2017

Heard. For the reasons spelt out in the application, the delay in filing the petition is condoned. The application stands disposed of.

Cr. Revision No.

/2017

The learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that there is a possibility of an amicable settlement being arrived at inter-se the parties at contest. For fructifying an amicable settlement, the presence of the parties before this Court is imperative. For the presence of the parties, the matter be listed on 13.3.2018.

Cr.MP No. 1521 of 2017

In the meantime, subject to the petitioner’s furnishing personal and surety bonds in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, also, subject to deposit of 10% of the compensation amount, within four weeks, from today, if not already deposited and also with an undertaking therein to (a) appear in the Court as and when called upon to do so (b) and in case the instant revision petition is dismissed, the petitioner shall surrender before the learned trial Court for receiving the sentence, thereupon the execution of sentence recorded by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. on 8.5.2015 in Case No. 803-3 of 2012, RBT No. 1970-3 of 2014/12 and as affirmed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. in Criminal Appeal No. 36-S/10 of 2016 on 3.11.2016, is suspended till further orders. However, it is made clear that in event of the applicant/petitioner herein omitting to comply with the conditions aforesaid within the stipulated period aforesaid, thereupon the order suspending the execution, of, sentence of imprisonment imposed upon him shall stand vacated and the Registry shall issue warrants committing the applicant/petitioner herein to judicial custody.

Dasti copy.

(Sureshwar Thakur ),

Judge.

29[th] December, 2017 (kck)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead