Himachal Pradesh High Court
None 3090/2013 on 30 December 2013
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 3090/2013 Decided on 30.12.2013
__________________________________________________________________ Jagjeet Chand ………..Petitioner
………..Petitioner……….Respondents
Versus
HRTC & Another
__________________________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? [1]
For the Petitioner : Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Varun Chandel, Advocate. _________________________________________________________________
Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral):
Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, submits that the representation made by the petitioner (Annexure P-6), has not been considered by the respondents. Consequently, present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Managing Director (Respondent No.1) to consider the representation made by petitioner, by passing a speaking and detailed order, within a period of six weeks from today. The Managing Director, while deciding the representation, shall also take into consideration the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 3015/2013 dated 27.5.2013 and consequential order passed thereon dated 11.10.2013.
2. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.
December 30, 2013 (vikrant)
(Rajiv Sharma) Judge
1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?