REVIEW PETITION 2937 of 2014 on 31 December 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESHSHIMLA

Civil Review Petition No. 151 of 2014 Decided on : 31.12.2014

State of H.P & others …..Petitioners Versus Raj Rani & another ….Respondents.

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?[1]

For the Petitioners: Mr. Vivek Singh Attri, Deputy Advocate General. For the Respondents: Nemo.

Sureshwar Thakur, J (oral)

CMP(M) No. 1691 of 2014

Heard. This application has been filed on behalf of the petitioners/State for condonation of delay of 49 days as has occurred in the institution of the Review Petition before this Court. Good, sufficient and abundant cause, which deterred the petitioner to move this Court, within time, is detailed in Paragraph 2 of the application, whose contents are duly supported by an affidavit. The said grounds do not divulge that there was any element of 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

deliberateness on the part of petitioner to not move this Court within time. Accordingly, the delay in the institution of the Review Petition before this Court stands condoned and the application is allowed and disposed of .

Review Petition No. 151 of 2014.

In the light of judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 2937 of 2014 titled as Kashmiri Devi versus State of H.P. & others rendered on 6.5.2014, no good and sufficient grounds have been made out by the learned Deputy Advocate General for reviewing the judgment of this Court. Consequently, the Review petition is dismissed.

December 31, 2014. (priti)

( Sureshwar Thakur ),Judge.