Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.PT/282/2021 of REETU Vs STATE OF HP AND ORS on 31 December 2021
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA ON THE 31st DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN EXECUTION PETITION NO. 282 OF 2021 Between:- SMT. REETU WIFE OF SH. CHANCHAL KUMAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. SHISHAMATI, TEHSIL AND DISTT. KULLU, H.P. PRESENTLY SERVING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLAON THE 31[st] DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHANEXECUTION PETITION NO. 282 OF 2021
Between:-
SMT. REETU WIFE OF SH.CHANCHAL KUMAR, RESIDENTOFVILLAGEANDP.O.SHISHAMATI,TEHSILANDDISTT. KULLU, H.P. PRESENTLYSERVINGASASAFAIKARAMCHARI/CHOWKIDAR INBDO OFFICE KULLU, DISTT.KULLU, H.P. CHANCHAL KUMAR, RESIDENTOFVILLAGEANDP.O.SHISHAMATI,TEHSILANDDISTT. KULLU, H.P. PRESENTLYSERVINGASASAFAIKARAMCHARI/CHOWKIDAR INBDO OFFICE KULLU, DISTT.KULLU, H.P.
(BY SH. A. K. GUPTA, ADVOCATE)
...PETITIONER
AND
1. STATE OF H. P. THROUGH THEPRINCIPALSECRETARY(DEVELOPMENT)WITHHEADQUARTERS AT SHIMLA,H.P.PRINCIPALSECRETARY(DEVELOPMENT)WITHHEADQUARTERS AT SHIMLA,H.P.
2.THE DIRECTOR OF RURALDEVELOPMENTANDPANCHAYATIRAJWITHHEADQUARTERS AT SHIMLA,H.P.DEVELOPMENTANDPANCHAYATIRAJWITHHEADQUARTERS AT SHIMLA,H.P.
3.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENTOFFICER, KULLU, DISTT. KULLU,H.P. OFFICER, KULLU, DISTT. KULLU,H.P.
(SH. ASHOK SHARMA, A.G.WITH SH. VINOD THAKUR,ADDL. A.G. AND SH. RAJATCHAUHAN, LAW OFFICER.)WITH SH. VINOD THAKUR,ADDL. A.G. AND SH. RAJATCHAUHAN, LAW OFFICER.)
...RESPONDENTS
This Petition coming on for orders this day, THE Court passed thefollowing:-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he isunder instructions not to press the instant petition. His statement istaken on record.
2. Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed as notpressed. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
31[st] December, 2021
(sanjeev)