Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/568/2014 of MANI RAM THAKUR Vs RUPALI THAKUR on 31 December 2014
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA COPC No. 568 of 2014 Date of decision: 31.12.2014 Sh. Mani Ram Thakur & others .…Petitioners Versus Smt. Rupali Thakur & another ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
COPC No. 568 of 2014 Date of decision: 31.12.2014
Sh. Mani Ram Thakur & others .…Petitioners Versus Smt. Rupali Thakur & another ….Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?[1]
____________________________________________________
For the petitioners : Mr. R.S. Gautam, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Balwant Thakur, Advocate.
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (Oral)
Issue notice. Mr. Balwant Thakur, Advocate, waives notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. This contempt petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to comply with the directions, dated 2[nd] September, 2014, passed by this Court in CWP No. 5893 of 2014, within a period of eight weeks, if not already complied with and report compliance before the Additional Registrar (Judicial).
3. The Registry to convey the order to the respondents and also furnish the copy of the same to the learned Counsel for the respondents. The petition stands disposed of alongwith pending applications.
Copy dasti.
( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) Chief Justice.
December 31, 2014, ( hemlata)
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge.
1Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.