Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/2304/2001 of TEK RAM MALAKAR Vs MP.STATE ADM.TRIBUNAL TH.THE REG. on 7 December 2001
Malakai S/o Attaflaai Malakar aged about 56 yeais Occupation Qovt Service Assisfaiit Teacher oosled at KantaHfladi, Dist.Rwgwt(C.Q.) M.P. State Adaaaistative Tribunal. - Huaugh the Regigtear M.P. Sfate Adintaisteative Tribiuafll Dist. Raipur ^.o^. ^ ;. : " (2) Stateof.Chliattisf imlding
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
TIT]SNNO.
Shri Teta-am' MalakaiS/oAttaflaaiMalakar aged about 56 yeais OccupationQovt Service Assisfaiit Teacher oosled atKantaHfladi,Dist.Rwgwt(C.Q.)^x^['..-]^.-^M.P.StateAdaaaistativeTribunal.- Huaugh theRegigtearM.P.SfateAdintaisteativeTribiuafll Dist. Raipur^"^.o^. ;.:(2)Stateof.Chliattisfimlding Raipur (C.O.).^3)Diat. Educatioapfficer, Rai:»A(C.O.)(4)CoumBSMonff',DivisiMiiBilagpur.WBTT PETTHQN U/A 22A/K7_OFTIffl.C^S!TITUT]
^?';'^"'^.i'':
XI-HC-22
~SSt '^Wtv\li, wSwis.hwwy.
^.f. ..'2-n>DLf/Z-6y1
.......,^
WTO'ITWWW
.^;~'':"?";-S'3g3ES'
:11
XI-HC-22
'S^ •<ii'!iid<<, a'al'M'ts, [«ti'ti+ii,<
W*(?IT<KWW[^.f.^.'L'^D^jq-iw-l]
3)1^^)T^I^f41''f TITOc?f'^ i^%t <F»1<^Ka^TOiTSK^SfN^ srfSg*; sii^iFeeltngaggrieve<bytliedecisionontheirrepresentationssoiaeofthemapproachedtheStateX'AdmuiistratlveTribzin,byfilingOriginalApplications.Leamed State Admmis|trative Tribiinal passed tndividualorders in each of the pef|tion. Against fhe prder passedby theState Adm.inistrative T|ribunal fhe petitioners have filedpetitions before this Coi-^rt.Ttie matter relatesLo policy pf rationalization of transferand posting of teachersof Priinary and Middle Schools. Theeducation session is:oming on. The order of ti-ajisfer andposting by which som.e d,the pgrsons/teachers are aggrievedis of the inonth of July2P01. Frora that time the teachers arelitigating tn Courts, tKeducation ofthe students is a^ctuig^in absence of teachersDr Shukla subimfs^ that in sQffle;^schools there is no teacljier and in soiae schools there is only^rf&Done teacher/hence not^achlng is; being carried pn and ther^K^pi^^l^'
'^.^'B:^S£.^:^^I^^%^^^fe^^^^,'^'IS^W^^Si^^S^^Si^A:.";;l'^;''^';Nti::;??K^S"f£::S
^'B:^S£.^:^^I^^%^^^fe^^^^,'
XI-HC-22
'ys -<wwi»,wS\-«»s,Kmwy
wqmwn^i
^-P- ,'T-n>OLf/<l-6^
XI-HC-22