Himachal Pradesh High Court

None 847 of 2008 on 31 December 2008

31.12.2008

CMPMO 847 of 2008

Present: Shri N.D. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Shri T.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondents No.1 & 2.

CMPMO No. 847 of 2008

Shri Tara Singh Chauhan, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2.

The petitioners are aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Shimla affirming the order passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. II, Shimla refusing injunction to the petitioner against the implementation of resolution passed by respondent No.1 whereby the seniority of petitioners has been disturbed.

Without going into the submissions made on the merits urged by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with a direction that any promotion made or action taken consequent to the resolution which has been challenged in appeal and which order has been assailed in this petition, shall be subject to the final outcome of the suit and shall not confer any right of permanence on the purported beneficiaries. Petition stands disposed of.

December 31, 2008 (ms)

(Dev Darshan Sud) Judge.

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead