Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/2153/2001 of PRIT RAM SAHU Vs THE STATE OF C.G. and ORS. on 4 December 2001
magi §3 OF 2001‘wvw'umx Lvuyx v. marl mv x » s.» BE‘IWEE’N »JL.M1N,~I,V._ reet Ram Sahu ,éged about 53years , S/o Shri Kartik Ram-Saha,3avpanch, Gram Panchayat Kopra, :Blocx Flngeshwar, District Ralpur. 1" PETITIGNER N Akw rr/ffi‘
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
v‘wvw'umx Lvuyxx v.»marl ms.»N\/WRIT PETITION magi §3 OF2001BE‘IWEE’Nrr/ffi‘»JL.M1N,~I,V._Kartikreet Ram Ram-Saha,3avpanch, Sahu,égedabout53years,S/oShriAkwGram Panchayat Kopra,:NNBlocx Flngeshwar,DistrictRalpur.iK1"PETITIGNERmwmuiacmm‘vmocmuwwuwcguw‘H,‘‘*-L1,;‘statelof Chhattisgarh,rThrough the Secret§ry Departmentof“PanchayatgD.,I<.Building:Raipur”._‘2.Sub Divisional Of£icer_,'Gariyabanah,IDistrict Raipum.3.‘Chief Executive OfficerkaxwJanpad Panchayat FingeshwarDistrictRaipur.ixrh¢¢?¢;”w{rrm.aw¢mvww Shri(Dakar Singhife,Q.’rUy Sarpanch,Gram Panchayat Kopara,76/5.Block Eingeshwardistrict mRaipur.\\~xi\RESPONDENTSWRIT'PETITIONUIMDL‘RARTI£11hS226/2276E mCUNsTlHUTION OFINDIA,,‘’’',i; eG
So,
oe
ATA ae
aiczlokS3,[0 by 2000ge
ee
ee
eG
So,
oe
ATA ae
aiczlokS3,[0 by 2000ge
ee
ee eeeee Se eemaiorSet ee ee wee VBRBs — —= 2|: +|| Shri Awadh Tripathilearned_ forthe petitioner.|. oo|| 7Met«ss||.—Ss—s—~—SsSShri Rajiv Shrivastava learned counsel forthe respondents, meaan The petitioner isaggrieved by the impugned order issued by the S.D.O. The petitioner isaggrieved by the impugned order issued by the S.D.O. petitioner isaggrieved by the impugned order issued by the S.D.O. isaggrieved by the impugned order issued by the S.D.O.aggrieved by the impugned order issued by the S.D.O. by the impugned order issued by the S.D.O. the impugned order issued by the S.D.O. impugned order issued by the S.D.O. order issued by the S.D.O. issued by the S.D.O. by the S.D.O. the S.D.O. S.D.O. — uePoa | removingIt has beenhim from the post of Sapa ledated 27.9.2001.po,aD. | ~ submitted by Shri Tripathi that though. | ere is appeliate authority, because of the|ce_.+|.delay in disposal , the interest|: 7ee - petitioner has approached this Court.of the)under writ, Article petitioner 226/227 is defeated. of the‘Constitution Hence the ofiuo-|India. Since the alternative remedy : already provided under the Since the alternative remedy : already provided under the the alternative remedy : already provided under the alternative remedy : already provided under the remedy : already provided under the : already provided under the already provided under the provided under the under the the relevant:| —_ —_are- fe provisions applicable to the case of the! writ petitioner, I am of the view that the fe provisions applicable to the case of the! writ petitioner, I am of the view that the provisions applicable to the case of the! writ petitioner, I am of the view that the applicable to the case of the! writ petitioner, I am of the view that the to the case of the! writ petitioner, I am of the view that the the case of the! writ petitioner, I am of the view that the case of the! writ petitioner, I am of the view that the the! writ petitioner, I am of the view that the petitioner, I am of the view that the I am of the view that the am of the view that the of the view that the the view that the view that the that the the oo -| —woka ob-. petitioner must exhaust appellate forum provided under section 91 of ob-. petitioner must exhaust appellate forum provided under section 91 of-. petitioner must exhaust appellate forum provided under section 91 of petitioner must exhaust appellate forum provided under section 91 of must exhaust appellate forum provided under section 91 of exhaust appellate forum provided under section 91 of appellate forum provided under section 91 of forum provided under section 91 of provided under section 91 of under section 91 of section 91 of 91 of of the_—— § y~.|PanchayatRaj Adhiniyam. Even otherwise becauseof shortageof judges carlya eehearing in this High Court can never be uaranteed,fe. - 7aTn the result this petition is disposed of with a directionthat if the writ||saeCO_ petitioner approaches the appellate a thority within 7 days. from today, the petitioner approaches the appellate a thority within 7 days. from today, the approaches the appellate a thority within 7 days. from today, the the appellate a thority within 7 days. from today, the appellate a thority within 7 days. from today, the a thority within 7 days. from today, the thority within 7 days. from today, the within 7 days. from today, the 7 days. from today, the days. from today, the from today, the today, the the wecoLieeappellate authority shall proceedto hear| and dispose of the case expeditiouslyanda! 7| oe|not later than 30 daysfrom the date of teceipt of the appeal. The delay,if any, in!|| Be: -|:: a| preferring Centified copythe appeal as per shall rules. stand rrcondoned-re—— - . : :Jo|_aChief Justice Set ee ee wee | VBR
Bs — —
| 7-
Met
| mea
Set ee ee wee
| VBR
Bs — —
| 7-
Met
| mea
an The petitioner isaggrieved by the impugned order issued by the S.D.O. The petitioner isaggrieved by the impugned order issued by the S.D.O. petitioner isaggrieved by the impugned order issued by the S.D.O. isaggrieved by the impugned order issued by the S.D.O.aggrieved by the impugned order issued by the S.D.O. by the impugned order issued by the S.D.O. the impugned order issued by the S.D.O. impugned order issued by the S.D.O. order issued by the S.D.O. issued by the S.D.O. by the S.D.O. the S.D.O. S.D.O. — ue Po —
po,
of = 7 :
India. Since the alternative remedy : already provided under the Since the alternative remedy : already provided under the the alternative remedy : already provided under the alternative remedy : already provided under the remedy : already provided under the : already provided under the already provided under the provided under the under the the relevant:
| —_ —_
- fe provisions applicable to the case of the! writ petitioner, I am of the view that the fe provisions applicable to the case of the! writ petitioner, I am of the view that the provisions applicable to the case of the! writ petitioner, I am of the view that the applicable to the case of the! writ petitioner, I am of the view that the to the case of the! writ petitioner, I am of the view that the the case of the! writ petitioner, I am of the view that the case of the! writ petitioner, I am of the view that the the! writ petitioner, I am of the view that the petitioner, I am of the view that the I am of the view that the am of the view that the of the view that the the view that the view that the that the the oo - woka ob-. petitioner must exhaust appellate forum provided under section 91 of ob-. petitioner must exhaust appellate forum provided under section 91 of-. petitioner must exhaust appellate forum provided under section 91 of petitioner must exhaust appellate forum provided under section 91 of must exhaust appellate forum provided under section 91 of exhaust appellate forum provided under section 91 of appellate forum provided under section 91 of forum provided under section 91 of provided under section 91 of under section 91 of section 91 of 91 of of the ne :
_ petitioner approaches the appellate a thority within 7 days. from today, the petitioner approaches the appellate a thority within 7 days. from today, the approaches the appellate a thority within 7 days. from today, the the appellate a thority within 7 days. from today, the appellate a thority within 7 days. from today, the a thority within 7 days. from today, the thority within 7 days. from today, the within 7 days. from today, the 7 days. from today, the days. from today, the from today, the today, the the we and “ “
~ -: :
at . :
— - . : :