Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMMO/469/2018 of KARTIK SHARMA Vs STATE OF HP on 31 December 2018
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 469 of 2018 Date of Decision : December 31, 2018 Kartik Sharma ...petitioner Versus State of H.P. …respondent _______________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 469 of 2018
Date of Decision : December 31, 2018
Kartik Sharma ...petitionerVersus State of H.P. …respondent _______________________________________________________________
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.Whether approved for reporting?[1]
_______________________________________________________________For the petitioner :Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent :Mr. S.C. Sharma, Mr. Dinesh Thakur and Mr.Sanjeev Sood, Additional Advocate Generalswith Mr. Amit Kumar Dhumal, DeputyAdvocate General, for the State.
____________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
Mr. Prashant Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf ofthe petitioner, on instructions, states that he may be permitted to withdrawthe present petition with liberty to file afresh, at appropriate stage.
2. Consequently, in view of the above, present petition isdismissed, as withdrawn, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to fileappropriate proceedings at appropriate stage, in accordance with law, if sorequired or desired.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
December 31, 2018(reena)
1Whether reports of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?