Gujarat High Court
SCA/5535/1985 of HAMIDMIYA M SHAIKH Vs DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER on 20 November 1997
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5535 of 1985 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5535 of 1985
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- HAMIDMIYA M SHAIKH
Versus DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR NK MAJMUDAR for Petitioner None present for Respondent
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
Date of decision: 20/11/97
ORAL JUDGEMENT
This matter was ordered to be heard with Special Civil Application No.5661 of 1985 and as per the office note that matter has already been decided. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the Special Civil Application.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement before this Court that the petitioner's services were regularized under the order dated 23rd October 1986 after filing of this Special Civil Application and now the only grievance which remains to be decided is to give him regularization from the deemed date, i.e. from the date of his initial appointment. So far as the grievance of the petitioner regarding giving him deemed date of regularization or of continuing the services of the petitioner is concerned, the petitioner is at liberty to file a representation and in case such a representation is filed to respondent No.1 within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same shall be considered on merits in accordance with law and shall be disposed of within a period of three months from the date of receipt thereof. In case the claim of the petitioner is not acceptable by respondent No.1, a reasoned order may be passed and a copy of the same may be sent to the petitioner by registered post A.D.
3. The Special Civil Application and Rule stand disposed of in aforesaid terms with no order as to costs.
.......
(sunil)