Gujarat High Court
MCACP/218/1994 of MAGANBHAI M PATEL Vs SIGIL INDIA SERVICES (P) LTD on 15 November 1995
OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.218 OF 1994. Date of decision: 15.11.1995. For approval and signature The Honourable Mr. Justice S.M. Soni and The Honourable Mr. Justice R.R.Jain Mr.Kalpesh Zaveri, advocate for applicant. Mr. Nilesh A . Parikh, advocate for respondent No.1.
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.218 OF 1994.
Date of decision: 15.11.1995.
For approval and signature
The Honourable Mr. Justice S.M. Soni
and
The Honourable Mr. Justice R.R.Jain
Mr.Kalpesh Zaveri, advocate for applicant.
Mr. Nilesh A. Parikh, advocate for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2-served.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of judgment?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
��Coram:S.M.Soni & R.R.Jain,JJ.
��-----------------------
��November 15, 1995.
Oral judgment (Per Soni,J)
Application is filed to take necessary action against the opponents under the Contempt of Courts Act on the ground that the opponents have wilfully defied the award passed by the Labour Court in Reference No.LCV.467/81 dated 11.2.1993. This Court in MCA No.397/91 and allied matters have held that Labour Court is not a court subordinate to the High Court under the provisions of Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Alahar Cooperative Credit Service Society v. Sham Lal, 1995 (2) GLH,550. In view of this, the application is not maintainable and is hereby dismissed. Rule discharged. No costs.