Chhattisgarh High Court
MCRC/10304/2021 of SHYAM SUNDAR DARRO Vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 30 December 2021
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C. No. 10304 of 2021 Shyam Sundar Darro, S/o. Shri Sukhiram Darro, aged about 36 years, R/o Village- Koyalibeda, Thana – Koyalibeda, Distt.- North Baster, Kanker (C.G.) ---- Applicant Versus The State of Chhattisgarh, Through Excise Officer, Excise Circle
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.Cr.C. No. 10304 of 2021
Shyam Sundar Darro, S/o. Shri Sukhiram Darro, aged about 36 years, R/o Village-Koyalibeda, Thana – Koyalibeda, Distt.- North Baster, Kanker (C.G.)
---- Applicant
Versus
The State of Chhattisgarh, Through Excise Officer, Excise Circle Antagarh, Distt. -North Baster, Kanker (C.G.)
----Non-applicant
For Applicant : Mr. Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate. For Non-applicant : Mr. K.K. Singh, Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.K. Chandravanshi
Order On Board
30-12-2021
(1) As per applicant, this is first bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.preferred by the applicant before this Court and no other bail application is pendingbefore any other Court.
(2) The applicant has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 16/2021 registeredat Excise Circle, Antagarh, Distt. North Baster, Kanker (C.G.) for commission of offencepunishable under Sections 34(2) & 59 (A) of C.G. Excise Act.
(3) Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the applicant was found in possession of40 bulk liters of country made liquor on 17.12.2021 and thereby committed the aforesaidoffences.
Page 1 of 2
(4) Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated inthe crime in question as no seizure has been made from him. He further submits that theapplicant has been arrested on 17.12.2021 and there is no previous criminal antecedentsagainst the applicant. He also submits that the applicant s permanent resident of District North Bastar, Kanker, therefore, there is no chance to influence the prosecution witnessesand absconding of the accused/applicant and conclusion of the trial is likely to takeconsiderable time, thus, the applicant may be enlarged on bail.
(5) Per contra, Counsel for the State opposes the bail application filed by theapplicant.
(6) I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
(7) Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, quantity of the liquorseized from the possession of the applicant and detention period of the applicant, I feelinclined to allow the bail application. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
(8) Accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personalbond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of thetrial Court. He is directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given tohim by the said Court till disposal of the trial.
Certified copy, as per rules.
Sd/-
(N.K.Chandravanshi) Vacation Judge
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…