Gujarat High Court
CRA/1856/1995 of ABDULKADAR JANMAHAMMAD Vs SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION on 21 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1856 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1856 of 1995
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- ABDULKADAR JANMAHAMMAD
Versus SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MRS KETTY A MEHTA for Petitioner
MR BP TANNA,Sr. Adv. with MR NIKHIL KARIEL for Respondent
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
Date of decision: 21/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Though if it would have been necessary for me to decide the matter on merits, I have my own reservation whether the orders could have been maintained but looking to the fact that for one reason or the other, the interim relief continues in favour of the petitioner and the matter pertains where the Corporation has ordered for demolition of four storeyed building, it is in the larger interest of the parties, that this petition may be disposed of in the terms that the learned trial court may dispose of the suit itself finally which is of the year 1991 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of writ of this order. Compliance of this order has to be reported to this court. Rule and civil revision application stand disposed of accordingly. Liberty is granted to the respondent for revival of this civil revision application in case the suit is not decided within four months.
***********
zgs/-