Gujarat High Court
CRA/1723/1995 of GORDHANBHAI ZAVERBHAI PATEL Vs GOVINDBHAI CHATURBHAI PATEL on 21 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1723 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1723 of 1995
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- GORDHANBHAI ZAVERBHAI PATELVersus GOVINDBHAI CHATURBHAI PATEL -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR DF AMIN for Petitioners None present for Respondent No. 1 MR YN Bhavsar for Respondent No. 2, 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 21/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
#. This civil revision application had come up for admission before this court on 19th September, 1995. The order of this court dated 19th September 1995 reads as Notice to respondent No.1 returnable on 26th of September, 1995. Process to be paid in the course of the day. Notice to be issued today only. Direct service is permitted.
Then it was admitted on 17th April, 1996.
#. Both the courts below have not considered it to be appropriate to grant any interim injunction in favour of the plaintiffs-petitioners and now at this stage, I do not consider it to be a fit case where any injunction has to be granted. Otherwise also, the learned counsel for the plaintiffs-petitioners submits that this court may give directions to the learned trial court to dispose of the suit itself finally at an early date as it is an old mater. To this request, the learned counsel for respondents has no objection.
#. Though the civil revision application is dismissed, Rule discharged, the learned trial court is directed to decide the Regular Civil Suit No.100 of 1993 within a period of one year from the date of receipt of writ of this order or certified copy thereof, whichever is earlier.
.......
[sunil]