Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/1964/2002 of DAULAT GIRI GOSWAMI and ORS. Vs THE STATE OF C.G.and ORS. on 9 December 2002
COURIOF GIHA’ITKSGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Beau-m No.49 69mom ?ETIITIONER‘§ : 1. Daulat Giri Goswami, Sjo Narajn Gili Gbswami, Aged absut 32 yeam, Rfo ‘£uage¥Put1d Kalan, Post— Palallsari, Kawardha, Dism'ct— Kawardha {CG}. 2. Maltesh Kumar Shanna, Sf0
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN[THE][ HIGH][ COURIOF][ GIHA’ITKSGARH][ AT][ BILASPUR]
Writ Beau-m[No.49][ 69]mom?ETIITIONER‘§:1. Daulat[Giri][ Goswami,]Sjo Narajn[Gili][ Gbswami,]Aged[absut][ 32]yeam,Rf o[‘£uage¥Put1d][ Kalan,]Post— Palallsari,[Kawardha,]Dism'ct—[Kawardha][ {CG}.]2.Maltesh[Kumar][ Shanna,]Sf0 Ramkhilawan[Shana]Aged about[31]years,Rfa[Village][ and]pust—[Panda][ Tami,]'..a,V1a— Pandaxia,[Kawaxdh,] 1/'_District[Kawaxtiha](CG)- Versusrv‘/\§sRFSPONDENTSJ/l"StateThroughsm ofChhamsgam[am] 6:,-9;»_.Depatmxent[0f][ PanchayaE"]Mantralaya,[Shastxi][ Chcwk,]Raipur (CG)Zjanpad[Panchayat][ Pandaxia,]Thmugh[its][ Chief][ Executive][ Officar,]’Pandmia,[Kawardha,]Distiict—[Kawarrma](CG)XX,”mUNDERARTICLE22BX22?OFTHEWRI’CONSTITUTfON[OF][ INDIA][ FOR][ ISSUANCE][ OF][ A WRIT][ IN]PROHIBITION,THENATUREOFMANDAMUS‘1ETC.OEANYOTHERDIRECTIONORQBEIORARIQRDER[TO][ DO][ JU][ STICE][ IN][ THE][ MA’ITER.]1[/]’Detaiis af[%h&]peiificm.x%.g1%®§LARTKXILARGF THE[PETITIONE%:]‘47§$\l[Eggs][ p'er][ cause][ title.]’f