Gujarat High Court
SCA/473/1991 of S R PATEL SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HEIRS Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 29 November 2002
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 473 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 473 of 1991
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?
-------------------------------------------------------------- S R PATEL SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HEIRSVersus STATE OF GUJARAT
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. Special Civil Application No. 473 of 1991 MR B.P. TANNA for Petitioner No. 1-1/2 MR M.R. MENGDEY, AGP for Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI
Date of decision: 29/11/2002
ORAL JUDGEMENT
1. When this petition is called out, it is pointed out that the petitioner is no more and his heirs are brought on record and now the question will not be of any promotion, but it will be of retiral benefits which may enure to the petitioner's heirs and therefore, the petitioner's heirs would like to make a representation before the respondent State in the matter. It is stated that a representation will be made by the heirs of the petitioner to the State Government seeking benefits to which according to them the petitioner was entitled under the Regulations of the Medical Council of India. It is stated that such a representation will be made within four weeks.
2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent authorities states that if such a representation is made, the respondent State shall consider the same in accordance with law and take a decision in the matter within three months from the date of receipt of such representation.
3. It is expected that the State Government will sympathetically consider the representation and take a decision in accordance with law thereon within three months from the date of receipt thereof. In view of this, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petition is not pressed at this stage. Rule is decision in accordance with law thereon within three months from the date of receipt thereof. In view of this, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petition is not pressed at this stage. Rule is therefore discharged with no order as to costs.
����[R.K.ABICHANDANI, J.]
parmar*