Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/3297/2003 of DHANI RAM BHAGAT Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND OTHERS on 5 December 2003
PETmGN hie/$2.057 120 Dhani Ram Bhagat aged about 5Q years s/whur Sai rlo Kherkatta Tehsif— Pathaigaon, District—Jashpur (€.G.) VERSUS RESPQNDENTS: - 1‘. State 0f Chhattisgarh Through Department secretaw of revenue ff D,K.S. Bhawan Raipur. (C13) The Cailector Jashpur,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
(tau <,
"
wmT PETmGN hie/$2.057
12003
Dhani Ram Bhagat aged about 5Q yearss/whur Sai rlo Kherkatta Tehsif—Pathaigaon, District—Jashpur (€.G.)
VERSUS
-1‘.State 0f ChhattisgarhThroughsecretawffDepartmentof revenueD,K.S. Bhawan Raipur. (C13)
RESPQNDENTS:
f
.The CailectorJashpur, Distt— Jashpur(C.G.)
The TehsildarPathalgaon, Distt—Jashpur (6.6.)
.PatwariHaika no,[-4]Tehsil, Pathalgaon,Distt.- $ashpur (6.8.)
“.Lanu Uraon slo Mussadiaged about 55yearsr10 KherkattaTehsil— Pathalgacn,Distriet-Jashpur {c.G.)
.Dhan singh aged about40 yearsS/o Lall‘u Ram rlo KherkattaTehsil— Pathalgaan District—Jashpur (C.G.)
Ram Sai aged about 55 years\Mahinath r/o KherkattaTehsil-Patha!gaon District—Jasheur(6.6.)
.‘Somu aged about 23 years s/oMadhur Sai r/o KherkattaTehsil- PathalggDistric—tan'4Jashpur(C..
WRIT PRTITION UNDER ARTICLE26! 27 OF THE 27 OF THE OF THE THE CONSTITUTiNDlAFOR {SSUENCE A WRIT 1N THE NATURE
26! 27 OF THE 27 OF THE OF THE THE CONSTITUTI 1N THE NATURE THE NATURE NATUREOF MAME
mmmm_ z,WalllcuU.xorder passai by thii TahSildarLs appolable boforé', the 83.0, Rovenueujlder S€ciii011 44 of fhé Chhattii;garh Land Révgnue Coda, 1959.L€an1€d comrsel for[the]1)atitionor submito that tho[Tohsildar][ is]notsupplyingcatiflsdcopy3ftheimpugnedordorthoroforethea1 before tho S.D.O. ¢L€am€d[comisel][ for]psii‘donor[is][ not][ able][ to][ flle][ appE]th€potitionei‘drowattentionofthoCourttoxrardothoI.A.No.9976,! 2003 application-for[exan]ption[from][ filing][ the][ certifred][ copy][ ofthe]ordor dt.1 1. 1. 1999, and towardS the documents Annexure[Pi][ 5][ and][ Pf][ 6]iiled. aloag with thiS[application.]
AnnsxuroP/Sisthoa;plicationdated1.8.2003tiledbytheddar,Patthalgaon,District- Jashpur inpotitionfsr[in][ the][ Court][ of][ Tohs]which thereis a remarkdt.83.2003[‘W]Woraa% WW%a%—da?§§(aI”. This remark reveals that neither/any case relating to[the][ Village]Kharkhatta is pending nor[it][ was][ ever]trier}.
Learried counsel for[the]ptitioner submits that the[Tehsildar][ may]be clirected to supply certified[c]py[of][ the][ order][ dt.]11. 1.1999 to enablethepetitioner[to]tile an appebefore theS.D.O.Revenuefor whichlearned Deputy Govt. Advocateas no objection.'sHaving heard learned coel for the parties and having[regard][ to]thefacts and circumstances[o]thecasethepetitionerisallowedtoVappmachtheTehsildarafresbyfilinganapplicationdemandingcertified copy of the[order][ dt.]1.1. P999 and the Tehsildar,[Patthalgaon]is directed to supply[certified][ c]py[of][ the][ order][ dt.]1 1. l. 1999 passed by."...1/”I/
\
X1—HC—22