Gujarat High Court
CRA/964/1995 of M/S. PARI ARVIND KUMAR MANGALDAS Vs BHAGWANDAS THAKURLAL SHAH on 19 November 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 964 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 964 of 1995
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- M/S. PARI ARVIND KUMAR MANGALDASVersus BHAGWANDAS THAKURLAL SHAH -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MB GANDHI for Petitioners None present for Respondent No. 1, 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
Date of decision: 19/11/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Challenge has been made by the
defendantspetitioners to the order of the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad dated 25-11-1994 in Summary Suit No. 2146 of 1992 under which conditional leave to defend has been granted to them on depositing a sum of Rs.10,000/-.
2. One of the contentions raised is that this order is a cryptic order.
3. I have gone through this order and find that the court has not given out any reasons in support of its this order. Grant of leave conditionally in summary suit is a serious matter and before doing so, the court has to consider all the aspects of the matter and then to pass a reasoned order.
4. In the result, this civil revision application succeeds and the same is allowed. The order dated 25-11-1994 of the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad passed in Summary Suit No.2146 of 1992 is quashed and set aside. The trial court is directed to pass fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned. Rule is made absolute.
**********
zgs/-