Gujarat High Court
SCA/7436/1997 of KALIDAS PARSHOTTAM PATEL Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 16 November 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7436 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7436 of 1997
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- KALIDAS PARSHOTTAM PATELVersus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SURESH M SHAH for Petitioner MR DP JOSHI, AGP for Respondent No. 1, 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH Date of decision: 16/11/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Rule. Service of rule waived by Mr. D.P. Joshi, Ld. A.G.P. for the respondents. 2. Heard. Short question involved in this petition is that the Government has rejected the petitioner's application for allotting 816 sq. mtrs. of land out of final plot no. 263 of survey no. 341/3 of Bodakdev on the ground that the petitioner happens to be the original owner of the land in question. The case of the petitioner is that he never had been the original owner or even the owner at any point of time of any portion of the land in question. In that view of the matter, the Government will have to reconsider the application.
Following direction is, therefore, issued :- The petitioner's application dated 25/6/1997
shall be considered and decided on the footing that the petitioner had or has never been the owner of any portion of the land in question. The decision shall be taken without being influenced by this order.
Subject to this direction, rule is discharged with no order as to cost.
* * *
**PVR**sca743697j.