Gujarat High Court
LPA/534/1988 of GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARD Vs RAJESHKUMAR BABULAL PANARA on 17 November 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 534 of 1988 in SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONNo 4886 of 1987 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.M.PANCHAL and MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 534 of 1988
in
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONNo 4886 of 1987
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.M.PANCHAL
��and
MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : YES 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : YES of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : YES of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : YES -------------------------------------------------------------- GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARDVersus RAJESHKUMAR BABULAL PANARA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MD PANDYA for Appellants MR MJ DAGLI for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE J.M.PANCHAL and �� MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR
Date of decision: 17/11/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
This appeal, which is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, is directed against order dated December 12, 1988 passed in Special Civil Application No. 4886/87 by which the appellants are directed to reinstate the original petitioner as apprentice during the pendency of above-numbered petition.
The respondent no.1 was appointed as an apprentice. According to the appellants, he was not eligible for being appointed as an apprentice and, therefore, his appointment was cancelled. That order was challenged by him in Special Civil Application No. 4886/87. The petition was placed for admission hearing before the learned Single Judge on December 12, 1988 and following order was passed :- "Rule. By way of interim relief, respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner as apprentice. The petitioner shall report for duty within 15 days from today."
The above referred to order is subject matter of challenge in the present appeal.
Mr. M.D.Pandya, learned Counsel for the appellants has produced true copy of the final judgment rendered by the learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application No. 4886/87 for our perusal. It indicates that the petition is dismissed by the learned Single Judge and interim relief granted is also vacated. As the main petition is disposed of, this appeal which is directed against interim order, does not survive and hence requires to be disposed of accordingly.
For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous, with no order as to costs.
********
(patel)