Gujarat High Court
SCA/571/1992 of UDAYKUMAR THAKORBHAI BHATT Vs ADDL OINDUSTRIES COMMISSIONER on 29 November 2002
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 571 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 571 of 1992
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?
-------------------------------------------------------------- UDAYKUMAR THAKORBHAI BHATT
Versus
ADDL OINDUSTRIES COMMISSIONER
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. Special Civil Application No. 571 of 1992
MR DD VYAS for Petitioner No. 1
MR MR MENGDEY, AGP for Respondent No. 1-2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI
Date of decision: 29/11/2002
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Learned Assistant Government Pleader places on record an order of the Industries Commissioner, dated 3.12.'96, which shows that the petitioner who was working as Junior Industries Inspector had resigned with effect from 30th September, 1996 and that resignation was accepted with effect from 30th September, 1996. In this view of the matter, the present petition in which the petitioner has challenged the order of his termination, which was stayed, has become infructuous. The petition is, therefore, disposed of as having become infructuous since the petitioner has resigned from 30th September, 1996, which fact is placed on record by the learned Assistant Government Pleader. Rule is, therefore, discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief stands vacated. Liberty to move in case of any difficulty.
����[R.K. ABICHANDANI, J.]
pirzada/-