Gujarat High Court
LPA/1328/1998 of M. T. SOLANKI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 4 December 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 1328 of 1998 in SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONNo 7530 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKER and MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 1328 of 1998
in
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONNo 7530 of 1998
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKER and
MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- M. T. SOLANKIVersus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: NANAVATY ADVOCATES for Appellant MR. ANANT DAVE, AGP, FOR Respondents No. 1 & 2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKER and MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE
Date of decision: 04/12/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
We have heard Mr. N.D. Nanavati and Mr. Anant Dave for the parties.
Mr. Dave appearing for the respondents makes a statement that the respondent-authorities are prepared to recall the impugned order directing the appellant to work in the Mid-day Meal Scheme, at Jamnagar and that the appellant will be placed at appropriate place in the Revenue Department and will not be asked or required to work in the Mid-day Meal Scheme where he is presently ordered to work under the impugned order dated 5th September, 1998 and the subsequent order dated 7th September, 1998.
In this view of the matter, without observing anything on merits, the appeal is disposed of. No costs.
����[ C.K. THAKKAR, J. ]
���� [ A.L. DAVE, J. ]
gt