Gujarat High Court
AO/407/1996 of AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPO. THRO' MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER Vs RAMESHCHANDRA KANCHANLAL TADVI on 26 November 1996
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No 407 of 1996 Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
APPEAL FROM ORDER No 407 of 1996
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPO. THRO' MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER
Versus
RAMESHCHANDRA KANCHANLAL TADVI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
M/S ANAND ADVOCATES for Appellant
MR MB GANDHI for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
Date of decision: 26/11/96
ORAL JUDGEMENT
1. Appeal admitted. Mr. M.B. Gandhi waives service for the respondent. At the joint request of learned counsel for the respective parties this appeal is taken up for final hearing today.
2. As a result of the discussion and hearing, a consensus has been arrived at between the learned counsel.
3. It is accordingly directed that the present respondent shall be deemed to have applied for appointment to the post in question in respect of the applications invited in the year 1995. The present respondent shall make a formal application in this regard for the purposes of record, latest by 2nd December 1996. On such application being made, the appellant Corporation shall then proceed with the appropriate procedure for recruitment and appointment, and the respondent shall be treated at par with other candidates who have applied.
4. In view of the aforesaid situation the impugned order is quashed and set aside. The Appeal stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. Direct service permitted.
******