Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/2021/2002 of KU.USHA TAMRAKAR Vs C.G.ELECTRICITY BOARD and ORS. on 6 December 2003
wmpetmon No ‘30 ’4 12002 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226,227 OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF INBIA PERETIT!ON KU. U$HA TAMRAKAR AGED 39 YEARS DAUGHTER OF LATE SOHANLAL TAMRAKAR RE$IDENT OF ASHOK VIHAR , BILASPUR TAHSIL AND DISTRICT BILASPUR (CHHATI‘IGARH) VERSIJS 1. CHHATTISGARH
AT BILA$PUR‘30 ’4wmpetmon No12002WRIT PETITIONUNDER ARTICLES 226,227 OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF INBIAPERETIT!ONKU. U$HA TAMRAKAR AGED 39 YEARSDAUGHTER OF LATE SOHANLALTAMRAKAR RE$IDENT OFASHOK VIHAR , BILASPUR TAHSIL ANDDISTRICT BILASPUR (CHHATI‘IGARH)VERSIJS'».Q[‘v](5[“RSPONDENTs]E1.CHHATTISGARH ELECTRICITY BOARD ELECTRICITY BOARD BOARD
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CHHATTISGARH ELECTRICITY BOARD ELECTRICITY BOARD BOARDTHROUGH $ECRETARY CHHATTISGARHELECTRICITY BOARDDAGNIYARAIPUR
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (CITYDIVISION) CHHA‘ITISGARH ELECTRICITIYBOARD, BILASPUR.M13. GEETANJALI CONSTRUCTIONTHROUGH PARTNER SHRI S R SAHUNEHRU NAGAR AMERI ROAD BILASPUR
WRITPETITIONUNDER ARTIQLESg3'6ggyg227'[OF]THEONSTITUTIONOFINDAFORISSQANCEOFW§ITOFMANDAHU§, CEETIOgg PROHIBITION AND 0g ANY OTHER g&!lORDERDIRECTIQN.INTNESAM§NATUREINTI‘IECIRCUHSTQNQES OF TLlg CgsE.
XI—HC-zz
EW,W§, WEI
'\/¢