Gujarat High Court
SCA/6445/1994 of RAJUBHAI @ KHIMJIBHAI H KHATARMAL Vs JAMNAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION on 23 November 1995
Decision:23.11.1995 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N N MATHUR 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of judgment? 4. Whether this case involves a
Date of Decision:23.11.1995
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N N MATHUR
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether their Lordships wish to see
the fair copy of judgment?
4. Whether this case involves a
substantial question of law as to the
interpretation of the Constitution of
India, 1950 or any order made
thereunder ?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge ?
.T........T........T........T........T........T........T........T........
Mr P R Abhichandani, Advocate for the petitioner CORAM ; N N MATHUR, J.
(November 23, 1995)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
The say of the petitioner in this Special Civil Application is that he is a displaced person being migrated from Pakistan in 1947. He is carrying on small business of pan, beedi, masala and cool drinks in his rekdi in the City from Pakistan in 1947. He is carrying on small business of pan, beedi, masala and cool drinks in his rekdi in the City of Jamnagar for the last more than 15-20 years. He is also paying rent to the Municipal Corporation.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents are evicting the petitioner in an arbitrary and unjust manner. It is also stated that in pursuance of the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, a scheme has been formulated for the hawking and non-hawking zones, but the petitioner has not been given the benefit of the said scheme.
3. Inspite of notice, none has appeared on behalf of the Jamnagar Municipal Corporation.
4. Considering the facts of the case, the respondent-Municipal Corporation is directed to consider the petitioner's case, if appropriate representation is made within a period of one month from today. If such representation is made, the same shall be disposed of within a period of two months thereafter. It is expected of the respondent-Municipal Corporation that the petitioner's representation shall be considered sympathetically.
....