Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/245/2007 of TEEKA RAM DANSENA AND ORS. Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ORS. on 18 January 1970
sn«w ^^.aor'7-— IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.Gt W.P. fSI N0. ^^S~ /200^ PETITIONERS : 1 ,••' > vy'v x1°.V".(- A " )>%^\. .0-y-l'^.°:-'" ..••"'7 <s .'••"" /'''Sy' t'l^'>\/
llllftfSifll»LE RSyfii sn«w
^^.aor'7-—
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR fC.GtW.P. fSI N0.^^S~/200^
PETITIONERS : 1
v,••' x1 > vy'°.V".(-A")>%^\.7.0-y-l'^.°:-'" <s .'••"" /'' ..••"''Sy't'l^'>\/•^:,""-. -f^- ,y /"
Teeka Ram DansenaAged about 44 Years,S/o.Shri Chhunilal DansenaAssistantTeacher,Govt.MiddleSchoolSinghitrai,Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)Gouri Shanker SidarAged about 40 years,S/o Shri Karmaha SidarAssistant teacher,Govt.GirlsPrimary School Dhurkot, BlockDhabhra,Distt.Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS1^"/2.
State of ChhattisgarhThrough Secretary,School Education DepartmentD.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)
The DirectorPublic Instruction DepartmentRaipur (C.G.)
3.
District Education OfficerJanjgir-ChamaDistrictJanjgir-Champa (C.G.)
r
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUION OF INDIA
~E
'ls)
Page 1 of 2
HI6H COUftT OF CHHATnS&WH AT BILASPURWP fS) No. 237 of 2007Petitioner :Roop Lal PatelVersusRe^wndents ;State of Chhutt-isgarh and o-thersWP.fS)No. 239 of 2007iPetitioner :JeevanLal BanjareVersus1 Respondents ;State of Chhattisgarh ond othersWP.(S)No. 240 of 2007Petitioner ;Badrika Pnasad OansenaVersusRespondents ;Stateof Chhattisgarh and othersWP.fS) No. 243 of 20)7Petitioner :Ku. Urmila SaoVersusRespondents :State of Chhattisgarh and othersW. P.fSlNo244 of 2007IPetH-ioner :Smt. Swimmoni TirkeyVersus :State of Chhatt-isgarh and others|RespondentsAndW. P.fSlNo 245of2W7Petitioners :TeekaRanrOansenaandanotherVersusRespondents :Stnteof Chhatt-isgarh and o-rtiersSB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish IC. Agnihotri. J
Present:Mr. Anil Mourya, counsel for the petitioners.Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents.
Bablu
^)
1OR&ER>(Passed ontiiis 18th Day of January, 2007)rThe following order of the Courf' is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J.
1. Learped counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as leomed Panellawyer for the State/respohdents jointly submit that the facts of theII.;.,;.•.^^. . ;. - \pres^nf writ petition is sjmiiar to that of in W. P. No,1463/2006'tli(Aemanr1:• Jain'. vs.•'• The'.''..'•.'.. State'. 6ovemment•.•'.''•' of Chhuttis9arh• d'• another),which was dispo»d pf vide order dated 10.11.2006. They furthersubfflit that the question of taw involved is also -the same.1.
2. In view of the above stated submissions macle by leamed counsel forF 'the part-ies, these writ petitions ore disposed of terms of the orderdatetl 10.11.2006 passed by this Court in 1463/2006 (Aeman Jain vs.The S^ate fiovemment of Chhatt-isgarh A another). No order as tocosts.
3. A copy of this order be piaced on record in other connected writpetitions.
Sd/-SatishK.AgnihotriJudge
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…