Gujarat High Court

SCA/360/1990 of DILIP RAMANIKLAL PARIKH HEIRS OF DECD. RAMANIKLAL S PARIKH Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 22 December 2000

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 360 of 1990 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 360 of 1990

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT

============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO

to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- DILIP RAMANIKLAL PARIKH HEIRS OF DECD. RAMANIKLAL S PARIKHVersus STATE OF GUJARAT

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

MR MAZGAONKAR for Petitioner

MS HARSHA DEVANI, AGP, for Respondent No. 1 MR ANANT S DAVE for Respondent No. 2

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT

Date of decision: 22/12/2000

ORAL JUDGEMENT

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the direction to calculate the revised pension of late Mr R.S.Parikh, former Chairman of the Gujarat Public Service Commission, as per the Government At the time of hearing, the attention of the Court was invited to the fact that earlier Special Civil Application No.391/70 filed by late Mr.R.S.Parikh for the same relief came to be withdrawn, unconditionally, by the order of the Court on 29.7.70. This position is also clear from the averments made in para 4 & 5 of the petition. It is a settled proposition of law that no successive petition would be maintainable. There is no subsequent cause of action or event which would warrant or prompt this Court to exercise extraordinary, plenary, discretionary, constitutional powers. Therefore, this petition deserves to be rejected. Accordingly, it is rejected. Rule discharged.

����(J.N.Bhatt, J.)

(vjn)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead