Gujarat High Court
SCA/9846/1999 of VAGHELA GATORSINH SHIVUBHA Vs DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER on 16 December 2003
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 9846 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 9846 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?
-------------------------------------------------------------- VAGHELA GATORSINH SHIVUBHA
Versus
DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. Special Civil Application No. 9846 of 1999
MR DJ BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 MR MENGDEY, AGP for Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
Date of decision: 16/12/2003
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Heard learned advocate Mr. D.J.Bhatt for petitioner and learned AGP Mr. Mengdey appearing on behalf of respondents.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that he was remained under suspension for a period of seven years in respect of the criminal prosecution filed against him. Thereafter, he was discharged from the criminal offence by a competent Court. Now that period of suspension has been excluded for the purpose of pensionary benefit by the respondents and that is how the present petition is filed by the petitioner before this Hon'ble Court.
3. Today, when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned AGP Mr. Mengdey has placed on record the copy of the letter dated 24.4.2001 from Superintendent of Police, wherein, it is mentioned that period of suspension from 22.7.1963 to 31.3.1970 has been treated as pensionable service accordingly pension of the petitioner will be revised and, same has been sanctioned by order dated 12.4.2001 by revised No. 35737. Copy of the revised order of pension is also attached to the said letter which is dated 9.4.2001. This letter has been shown to learned advocate Mr. D.J.Bhatt. Therefore, according to my opinion, no grievance further survive. Therefore, in view of the aforesaid two letters dated 24.4.2001 and 9.4.2001 present petition is accordingly disposed of as grievance of the petitioner is fully satisfied. Rule is discharged.
4. Copies of the two letters dated 24.4.2001 and 9.1.2001 are taken on record.
�����(H.K.Rathod,J)
Jayanti*